Linux – Free as in Salvation. Eph 2:8-9
RSS:
Publications
Comments

Church Websites

*JMJ* Howdy!  First, a brief introduction.  I have been a Linux user for about 10 years and some folks may know me from the Linux Reality podcast   I hope to throw out some interesting tidbits from time to time about those points where Linux/FOSS and Christianity intersect.  Being Catholic, some of the information will be Catholic-centric, but I will try to keep it as general as possible.  :-)

For starters, here is a funny list of common mistakes church websites might make. I suppose “Running a Website on IIS” could be added to the list?

Chess Griffin

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Identi.ca
  • LinkedIn
  • Ping.fm
  • Twitter

Ubuntu 10.04 LTS

It’s been a while in coming, but here’s my review of Ubuntu 10.04 LTS (Long-Term Support). Functionally speaking, it has a few improvements over 9.10. The biggest improvement I saw was the fact it actually supported the wifi indicator light on my laptop. Normally, when running under Windows, it turns red when the wifi is off, and is blue when the wifi is on. Under Ubuntu 9.10, (or any version of Linux for that matter,) it would only show red. Now under 10.04 LTS, it works exactly as it does under Windows. Also, in the wifi department, it seems to connect faster than it did under 9.10, and the connection is more stable. On the whole, though, aside from a few program updates, most of the changes appear to be aesthetic.

The default visual aspects of Ubuntu 10.04 LTS are where the big changes are. The new Ambiance control widget set and window border provide a unique look that definitely looks upgraded. (I’m not a Mac fan, so I’d prefer the title-bar buttons to be arranged in the traditional Windows format, but that’s minor.) Also, the warm earth-tones are gone, in favor of purples, warm grays, and red-orange accents. The new color scheme and control set give it a far more “technological” feel than the old Human control set and orange and brown palette. Until this release, Ubuntu’s visual appeal has always fallen far short when compared to other distros, or even with Windows.

Now for the bad news. The network upgrade didn’t work well at all. After making sure my current install of 9.10 was fully updated, and enduring the 4 – 6 hour upgrade process, (that’s download and installation time combined,) the upgrade broke at the very end and gave me the a warning that my system was in an unstable (and unrecoverable) state because something fouled up during the upgrade process. Also, after installing the 64-bit version, i found out that none of the Flash player variants (even Adobe’s) work for the 64-bit version. Furthermore, Adobe has pulled their 64-bit test version off of the Adobe Labs site, leaving your only option to use Flash as running the 32-bit version of Ubuntu 10.04 LTS.

All in all, though, Ubuntu 10.04 LTS makes a good replacement to the previous LTS version as well as 9.10, just be sure to use the 32-bit version, (unless you don’t care about Flash, that is).

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Identi.ca
  • LinkedIn
  • Ping.fm
  • Twitter

Stupid Christians

I am sort of at odds here. I have been hurt and insulted and need to jot down some thoughts. This may not even be the most appropriate forum for this but there are some applicable parts, so here goes…

I have been a long time member of a special mailing list. One which contains some of the most brilliant people in the computing industry, from all over the world. How I even got invited to participate, I will never know. These are people with vast esoteric knowledge. People whom I befriend, respect and love.

This mailing list has given me the opportunity to learn and grow in many ways. I have drawn from the vast resources there and gained knowledge in computers, Unix and a plethora of other fascinating secular subjects. I have also had the chance to observe, and sometimes participate in, a number of sideline religious conversations. This is where I have been given the opportunity to practice a lot of patience. :-)

What I have learned about technically smart people or secularly smart people, and this has really been backed up by this particular group as well as my inclusion in several other not so extreme technical groups, is that Christians are perceived to be stupid. Sometimes not intentionally so, but more of a silly childish, simpleminded, bumble-dumb, shrub-ish kind of stupid. Sometimes it’s completely intentional, as in rejecting “established” science, at least on initial appearance.

I have to say that the repetitive mudslinging against Christians by “well meaning” albeit misinformed pagans tends to grate on me, more than a little. Interestingly enough, I do not encounter many atheists amongst such a crowd, but mostly pagans. Perhaps it is because, as a smarter subset of people (techies, not pagans), they inherently and subconsciously realize that current science still has some inadequacies. This is something even Albert Einstein made mention of in some articles he penned as well. “Science without religion is lame…” is what he said, and I am not saying that A.E. believed the way you or I do, but at least he recognized the importance of religion, of faith.

I do understand in the Bible we are told that Christians *will* be made to suffer *for* their faith (2 Tim 3:12 and many others) and this has never been made more apparent to me than by maintaining an association with these technical people. Scientifically speaking, Christians are viewed as stupid for faith, believing in seemingly scientifically impossible things like the virgin birth or Christs’ resurrection. There is also the persecution *of* their faith. This is where the very element, source, and root of paganism (the prevailing religion amongst highly skilled technical people IMO) causes them to lash out in hatred and disdain for anything remotely Christian. Again, pagans seem to have no problems whatsoever with Hindus or Buddhists, Gnosticism and even Islam, but there seems to be an underlying seething hatred for all things Christian.

Why exactly is this? I am forced into two conclusions. The first is the Biblical conclusion that their collective cynicism hails from the same author ( 1 Peter 5:8 ). The other is slightly more complicated. I believe these people are facing an internal dichotomy of sorts. As pagans, they have accepted, on some level, there may be some extra-normal explanation for things. As educated, smart people, they are subconsciously coming to the realization that their personal religion is fake, ie they made/make it up to suit themselves individually, so therefor, they believe all religion to be fake, thus invalidating it from their perspective. At least that is the sort of thought process I believe I am observing. In truth, the real scientific method applied here would only invalidate their own paganistic religion as not passing muster. I guess this is the point where 1 Peter 5:8 takes over, where logic in the purest sense fails or is overridden.

What spurred this topic on? Why the rant and observations? I have, in essence, reached my fill, at least temporarily, of Christian insult. Call me fat. Tell me I dress funny or have a bad haircut. At least those are in some way observable, even if opinionated. I am tired, however, of being called a Stupid Christian, and am unwilling to sit around and ignore those comments any further. I have reached my limit of cheeks to turn, so to speak.

How do we make things better? I don’t know. Apologetics? Prayer? Perhaps. Do I simply sequester myself from those people? Even though we are *in* not *of* this world, I do not think that is the answer. I am just not sure what is. How do you minister there? What do you think? Comments welcome on this one folks!

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Identi.ca
  • LinkedIn
  • Ping.fm
  • Twitter

Panera ++

Panera

Panera


Just when you thought all corporations were evil, one of them surprises you by having a heart.

http://www.bizjournals.com/stlouis/stories/2010/05/17/daily21.html

I don’t know about the rest of you but I think I am dragging my family to Panera for dinner tonight :)

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Identi.ca
  • LinkedIn
  • Ping.fm
  • Twitter

Great Stewardship!

“It’s getting that time again folks. I don’t see any offers at FLB, so let’s get together and spread the word. Help out your Linux challenged neighbors around the world by giving the gift of technology. Spread the word, donate your old laptop and make someone happy……..”

Read more at http://lincgeek.org/blog/?p=994

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Identi.ca
  • LinkedIn
  • Ping.fm
  • Twitter

Latest Distro Updates

In the world of Linux distributions, there are two that I have become fond of. Ironically, one of them is one that I used to avoid at all costs. Recently, they have both announced new releases. The first, (and my former favorite,) PCLinuxOS, has recently put out its 2010 release. Now using KDE 4.4 as its primary desktop, many of the issues that I had with the 2009 release seem to have been appropriately addressed. My only hesitation with recommending this particular distribution is past experience. In the past, about the time a new release is in the works, the repositories would become a nightmare, and your beautiful install would completely fall apart. Reinstalling did no good, because once you updated, you’d be right back where you started. Perhaps this trend is merely a thing of the past, and won’t be an issue now that KDE 4.4 is the default desktop rather than KDE 3.5. (I know most of the issues previously came when upgrading to KDE 4.x.) Once I’ve had a little more time to play with it, and actually get it up and running rather than merely playing with the live CD, I will have a more thorough review.

The next distro is one that I find myself surprised to be using: Ubuntu. Recently, the new Long Term Support (LTS) version has been announced. 10.04 will replace 8.04 as Ubuntu’s LTS release. While not completely satisfied with Gnome or Ubuntu, in general, 9.10 did make an adequate replacement to PCLinuxOS while their repositories got straightened out. I have since learned my way around Gnome, (though I still prefer KDE,) and learned to deal with some of the quirks related to it and Ubuntu. 9.10 is decent, but I can certainly understand why it is not being used for the LTS release. 10.04, however, is still in beta, though it is set for final release in the very near future. Due to the issues I had while testing 9.10’s beta, I doubt I’ll even look at 10.04 until the final release is out, though rest assured, once it is out, I will have a full review.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Identi.ca
  • LinkedIn
  • Ping.fm
  • Twitter

7 of the Best Free Linux Bible Software

Easter is the most important annual religious festival for Christians. It is the celebration of the resurrection of the central figure of Christianity, Jesus of Nazareth (Jesus Christ). It therefore seems an appropriate point in the year for us to turn our attention to open source Linux Bible software………….
http://www.linuxlinks.com/article/20100328144637234/BibleSoftware.html

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Identi.ca
  • LinkedIn
  • Ping.fm
  • Twitter

A Peaceful Coexistence: Linux and Windows 7 on the Same Machine

I’ve written about this elsewhere, but thought it was worth repeating. While I do have systems that run exclusively on Linux, my laptop, (and a good number of installations in the real world,) are dual-boot installs. In the past, this has never been that big of an issue. I’ve always just let GRUB handle the task, and all was well. In fact, when I bought the laptop, it came preloaded with Windows Vista. I adjusted the partition size, set up my linux partitions, and did a standard install, allowing GRUB to write itself to the MBR, and all was happy. Then, I upgraded my Windows installation to Windows 7, (namely because I wanted to switch to all 64-bit operating systems).

I don’t know if this is just an issue with the 64-bit version of Windows 7, or if this inherent with all versions of Windows 7, or if only certain “lucky” people experience this, but I know that I am not alone in this problem; thus, the impetus for this article and its predecessor. Upon upgrading to Windows 7 and reinstalling GRUB, Windows 7 decided that something was broken. When it “fixed” the supposed problem, all of my software, including Microsoft Office 2007, had been uninstalled. When I reinstalled any of the software, the so-called problem returned.

My first instinct was to try to install everything from scratch. I wiped the hard-drive. Reinstalled both Windows 7 and Linux, but with GRUB in charge of loading, the problem of Windows not allowing any software to be installed without thinking something was wrong remained. What I finally deduced is that unlike its predecessors, Windows 7 will only be happy if Windows Boot Loader is in the Master Boot Record (MBR). This makes dual-booting with Linux a tricky proposition, but not impossible. Unless you are very familiar with the Windows command line tool, bcdedit, I would recommend EasyBCD from NeoSmart.net to aid in this process.

I will now relate to you the method to effectively get Windows 7 and Linux to dual-boot on your system. These instructions assume that you’ve already set up Windows 7 and set aside unpartitioned space for your Linux distribution.

Step 1: Make sure /boot has its own partition. Typically, I do this anyway, even if I’m not dual-booting a system. My normal setup for a desktop or laptop system that is going to be dual-booting is to use 4 primary partitions set up as follows: NTFS (Windows) on /dev/sda1, /boot on /dev/sda2, swap on /dev/sda3, and root (/) on /dev/sda4.

Step 2: Install Linux normally except for the bootloader. Allow Linux to install using all the regular settings you normally would except when it comes to installing GRUB. Depending on the distribution you are using depends on exactly when and how you will need to make these changes which are in the next step.

Step 3: Install GRUB to the /boot partition. If you have followed my partitioning scheme, you will need to tell GRUB to install to /dev/sda2 instead of the MBR (/dev/sda0). Also, if you have the option to customize the GRUB menu entries at this time, go ahead and remove any references to Windows that have most likely been added. Some versions of Linux won’t let you do that at this point, so if you can’t modify the menu entries, don’t worry about it, and just change where GRUB will be installed. Remember, if you have set up your partitions differently, use the partition that has /boot assigned to it.

Step 4: Modify the Windows Boot Loader. Once Linux is done installing, allow your system to reboot. It should reboot back into Windows 7. Use your tool of choice (bcdedit from the command line, or EasyBCD) to add a menu entry to the Windows Boot Loader and to modify the time out setting so you have time to make a choice when the menu shows. Your menu entry should point to the /boot partition. This is why I recommend using EasyBCD. All you have to do is select the operating system type, give it a name, decide on the amount of time you want for the delay, pick what boot loader you are using (for Linux, default is GRUB), and what partition it’s located on, and EasyBCD takes care of all the complicated back-end stuff that you have to do manually if you use bcdedit.

Once you have completed step 4, you can reboot your system again. You should see your new entry below Windows 7. Go ahead and select your Linux entry and hit the enter key. This should now bring up the GRUB menu. Choose your Linux entry from the GRUB menu and it should happily load. You can now go and modify your GRUB menu if you weren’t able to do so during the installation process, to remove the reference to your Windows installation and possibly eliminate the timer so you don’t have to go through two menus to load Linux; though, some versions of Linux have multiple load options, so the latter option might not be that good of an idea.

If you have successfully completed all four steps, you are now happily dual-booting Windows 7 and Linux. Why go to all that trouble? There are multiple reasons, ranging from the comfort level of the user to application-specific necessity, but for me there were really only two reasons: first, despite the fact that I am a huge fan of Linux, I still like Windows; and second, to prove it can be done.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Identi.ca
  • LinkedIn
  • Ping.fm
  • Twitter

End of days

Sometimes it’s good to work in Philadelphia. Today, for instance I got off the train and started walking to work when I was handed a flier from some young woman with a thick accent mumbling something about the Bible. I just grabbed it and put it in my pocket for later review (hey, it’s cold in Philly at 7am).

Upon later review, I found that it was a good thing I kept that flier because it outlines “THE END OF THE WORLD!”

Seriously, this particular flier names the rapture date as May 21, 2011 and the EOW itself at Oct 21, 2011. We all know that Nostradamus and the Mayans want it in 2012, maybe this is an effort to get a jump start on things?

As it turns out, this pamphlet is full of various types of numerology based on Old Testament dates, etc., and brought to me (and you too) by EBible Fellowship.

Here is what worries me……:

The secular world only knows Christianity from what they see. They are inundated with sunday morning money grubbing prosperity preachers, crazies wearing billboards, and nice people like this who hand out information which LOOKS on it’s face as if it may be legitimate (to someone who hasn’t read the book).

What are we to do?

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Identi.ca
  • LinkedIn
  • Ping.fm
  • Twitter

Manhattan Declaration

National Religious Leaders Release Historic Declaration on Christian Conscience
Washington, D.C., Press Conference Unveils 4,700-Word Statement Signed by Some 150 Orthodox, Catholic & Evangelical Leaders

WASHINGTON, D.C., Nov. 20, 2009—Today a group of prominent Christian clergy, ministry leaders and scholars released the Manhattan Declaration, which addresses the sanctity of life, traditional marriage and religious liberty. The 4,700-word declaration issues a clarion call to Christians to adhere to their convictions and informs civil authorities that the signers will not—under any circumstance—abandon their Christian consciences. Drafted by Dr. Robert George, Dr. Timothy George and Chuck Colson and signed by more than 150 Orthodox, Catholic and evangelical Christian leaders, the Manhattan Declaration was made public at a noon ET press conference held in the Lisagor Room at the National Press Club.

Among the signers of the Manhattan Declaration at the press conference:

* Joel Belz, Founder, World Magazine
* Chuck Colson, Founder, The Chuck Colson Center for Christian Worldview
* Jim Daly, President and CEO, Focus on the Family
* Marjorie Dannenfelser, President, Susan B. Anthony List
* Fr. Chad Hatfield, Chancellor, CEO and Archpriest, St. Vladimir’s Orthodox Theological Seminary
* Robert George, McCormick Professor of Jurisprudence, Princeton University
* Timothy George, Professor, Beeson Divinity School at Samford University
* Harry Jackson Jr., Bishop, Hope Christian Church
* Fr. Francis Martin, Professor of Sacred Scripture, Sacred Heart Major Seminary
* Fr. Martyn Minns, Missionary Bishop, Convocation of Anglicans of North America
* Rev. Neftali “Charles” Olmeda, National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference
* Tony Perkins, President, Family Research Council
* Fred Potter, Executive Director and CEO, Christian Legal Society
* Justin Rigali, Archbishop of Philadelphia, Diocese of Philadelphia
* Alan Sears, President, CEO, and General Counsel, Alliance Defense Fund
* Ron Sider, Professor, Palmer Theological Seminary and Director of the seminary’s Sider Center on Ministry & Public Policy
* Fr. Robert Sirico, Founder, Acton Institute
* George Weigel, Distinguished Senior Fellow, Ethics and Public Policy Center and Founding President of the James Madison Foundation
* Donald William Wuerl, Archbishop of Washington, Diocese of Washington, D.C.

Excerpts from the declaration include:

“We are Christians who have joined together across historic lines of ecclesial differences to affirm our right—and, more importantly, to embrace our obligation—to speak and act in defense of these truths. We pledge to each other, and to our fellow believers, that no power on earth, be it cultural or political, will intimidate us into silence or acquiescence.”

“We recognize the duty to comply with laws whether we happen to like them or not, unless the laws are gravely unjust or require those subject to them to do something unjust or otherwise immoral.”

“…We will not comply with any edict that purports to compel our institutions to participate in abortions, embryo-destructive research, assisted suicide and euthanasia, or any other anti-life act; nor will we bend to any rule purporting to force us to bless immoral sexual partnerships, treat them as marriage or the equivalent, or refrain from proclaiming the truth, as we know it, about morality and immorality and marriage and the family.”

The Manhattan Declaration

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Identi.ca
  • LinkedIn
  • Ping.fm
  • Twitter